Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.53 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX
