Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
