Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG
Spinning
4000mhgx
94.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/165
Conclusion
Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.53 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X
