Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

79.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.53 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €159.80
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Vanquish FC

Spinning

86.30 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.5 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight150g / 5.29oz

Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €399.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2500SC
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX and Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 70 centimeter / 27.56 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Vanquish FC?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency

Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles