Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.53 out of 10) and total score (8.55 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
