Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X
