Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
