Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX
