Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and ball bearings (6). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X
