Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (175g / 6,17oz). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 22,6kg / 49,82lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
