Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

85.50 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.53 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €159.80
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano 20 Stella

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight415g / 14.64oz

Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €677.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 XG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX and Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 101 centimeter / 39.76 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano 20 Stella?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency