Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX edges out Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.8:1). Still, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 13kg / 28,66lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano 20 Stella?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
