Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX and Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX stands out for a maximum drag of 13kg / 28,66lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano 20 Stella?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX
