Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
74.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/230
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX edges out Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.8:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
