Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX offers a gear ratio of 5.8:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX
