Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and total score (8.55 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Cardiff 301A?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
