Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.53 out of 10) and total score (8.55 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
