Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX offers a line retrieve per crank of 76 centimeter / 29.92 inch, while Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS stands out for a maximum drag of 19kg / 41.89 lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
