Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ), 2500-XH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10426-251
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €163.20
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Daiwa 21 Certate SW, 8000-P, left and right hand, Sea Fishing Spinning Reel, Front Drag, 10315-081
Daiwa 21 Certate SW
Seafishing
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.52 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €585.00
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size8000-P
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/300

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX and Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX offers a ergonomics of 6.35 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 92 centimeter / 36.22 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 21 Certate SW?

There are not much differences between the two comparables