Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5291oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25197 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX edges out Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 150g / 5291oz and a ergonomics of 6.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 21 Presso LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX
