Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Tanacom 500, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Daiwa Tanacom 500 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
