Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €15.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/315
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX
