Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa BG 8000X
