Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
