Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X
