Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
