Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and ball bearings (6). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX
