Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
74.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/230
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and ball bearings (6). While Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
