Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Beastmaster
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX edges out Shimano Beastmaster with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (6.2:1). Still, Shimano Beastmaster holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Beastmaster?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L
