Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (195g / 6,88oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
