Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the weight (195g / 6,88oz). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
