Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X
