Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 23 Saltiga
Seafishing
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.83 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €777.77
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX edges out Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a weight of 400g / 14,11oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 23 Saltiga?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Penn Battle III 6000X
