Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €14.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (8.54 out of 10). While Delphin BRONZ 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX
