Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (8.54 out of 10). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
