Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
