Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
