Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX
