Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (195g / 6,88oz). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X
