Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
76.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.46 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight660g / 23.28oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size14000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/240
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX edges out Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX
