Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (195g / 6,88oz) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 68 centimeter / 26.77 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
