Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 4000-HX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
