Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 190g / 6,7oz and a ergonomics of 6.37 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX
