Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Cardiff 201A?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX
