Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (8.54 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Sahara 1000 R?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Stradic FM
