Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

89.70 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.58 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €175.50
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT

Spinning

71.50 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €68.70
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000-CXH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.58 out of 10) and the total score (8.97 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.