Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

89.70 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.58 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €175.50
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.35 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight195g / 6.88oz

Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 S-XH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX offers a durability of 8.58 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.