Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.51 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.12oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €319.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 145g / 5,12oz and a ergonomics of 6.52 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
