Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
45.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Crossfire LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X
