Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa GS LTD
Spinning
27.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.66 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €83.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/220
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa GS LTD 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (8.97 out of 10). While Daiwa GS LTD 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa GS LTD?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX
