Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa TD Match
Feeder And Match
64.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €153.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa TD Match 4012X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and weight (230g / 8,11oz). While Daiwa TD Match 4012X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa TD Match?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
